These are the initiatives currently on the ballot, along with how I will vote on each, and why. I took the text describing each initiative from Balletpedia.
If any others are added, I will endeavor to add them here.
State Question 776 was designed to assert that all methods of execution shall be constitutionally allowed, unless prohibited by the United States Constitution, and designated statutorily by the legislature.
My take: I will vote NO on this. I have been a capital punishment supporter pretty much all my life. OTOH, I have changed my opinion over the past couple years, with the large number of people freed from death sentences following DNA testing and other advances in crime science, along with the appalling race bias in the courts. I am of the opinion that the standard for capital punishment should change from “beyond a reasonable doubt” to “proven”, given that capital punishment is something that can’t be recovered from once it is applied. Until then, I oppose any loosening of the ability for states to ease execution. The disgraceful rush to kill exhibited in Oklahoma over the past couple years is a good enough reason to keep the brakes on.
State Question 777 was designed to establish a constitutional guarantee for farmers and ranchers to engage in farming and ranching practices.
My take: I will vote NO on this. This looks to extend extra protections to farmers that would essentially make them unregulated or less able to be regulated. Since unregulated farming has made huge messes (think chicken farms in Arkansas or hog farms in Oklahoma), they clearly need the scrutiny.
My take: I will vote YES on this, under protest. The protest is that this is yet another state question that is required because the Oklahoma State Legislature will not do the job the Legislators swore they would do. Specifically, fund education. One difference is that this measure is not on the ballot by the Legislature, but in spite of it.
State Question 780 was designed to reclassify certain property offenses and simple drug possession misdemeanor crimes.
My take: I will vote YES on this. I do wish that the felony limits on theft of personal property were left at $500 instead of $1000, but overall, this looks like better use of prison resources.
State Question 781 was designed to use money saved by reclassifying certain property and drug crimes as misdemeanors outlined in State Question 780 to fund rehabilitative programs.
My take: I will vote YES on this as well.
State Question 790 was designed to repeal Section 5 of Article 2 of the Oklahoma Constitution, which prohibits public money from being spent for religious purposes.
My take: I will vote NO on this. If they had a way, I would vote HELL NO ( 🙂 ). This is an attempt by the Legislator and Governor (all Republican controlled, it should be noted) to pander to Christians and try to get a monument to Deuteronomy 5:4–21 placed back on the state capitol grounds, Establishment Clause be damned. We’ve had too much in the way of enshrining religious practice in law in the country, and this state, and I hope this is not approved. I do think that if it is, it will be found un-Constitutional in Federal court.
State Question 792 was designed to allow grocery stores and convenience stores to sell full-strength beer and wine.
My take: I will vote YES on this. There isn’t any good reason for alcohol drinks to only be sold in liquor stores. Sounds like a chance for good, healthy competition to me. Next, lets’s open it up to all booze, and let’s see it sold on Sunday (and Election Day, if that’s still not legal). It’s done that way in numerous states, and they haven’t seen any moral collapse.